Tag Archives: David Hume

A Return to Rationality

The more I dig into contemporary intellectual discourse the more I see that Hume was dead right that reason is and must always remain ‘the slave of the passions’.   (As I said, Kant was more subtle, but the bottom line is the same.)  Everywhere I look the same pattern turns up over and over again: [...]
Posted in 1 philosophy, topical | Also tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sapere aude!

Over at TPM, Craig Nelson, has written a paen to the enlightenment, To cry “Sapere aude!” once again, finishing with a lament on how scientifically illiterate our culture is. There is, however, a dark side to this history, and it has nothing to do with Foucault. The entire Enlightenment revolution in thinking centred around one key [...]
Posted in 1 philosophy, topical | Also tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Invention of Autonomy

In my quest to define what I mean by moral philosophy I will, again, contrast it with something that it is not: The Invention of Autonomy, J.B. Schneewind’s great historical account of modern moral philosophy culminating in the moral philosophy of Kant.  I will do this by way of commenting on some key passages from [...]
Posted in 1 philosophy | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fanny, Edmund and Lovers’ Vows

I have hammering the philosophy heavily of late. This is all supposed to be by way of preparation, getting a clear picture of the object to be negated—Enlightenment sentimental ethics—for the real action of the blog when we dive into Sense and Sensibility and the other Austen novels, and show how these ethical systems [...]
Posted in 1 philosophy | Also tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Experimental Philosophy: back to Hume?

It was my intention to spend this Sunday writing a positive summary of this blog’s philosophy but watching Joshua Knobe’s discussion with John Horgan on bloggingheads.tv in February 2008, has lead to change of plan and the return of the Punk Philosopher. The diavlog opens with a short discussion of Joshus’s biography (where we learn that [...]
Posted in 1 philosophy | Also tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Post-rational Civilization

In many of my posts now I have been stating that we live in an age of unreason, and that this was an innovation of the Enlightenment.  Nearly all of the recent posts reflect this theme but these recent posts have been quite explicit: The Great Evolution Debate Appleyard on the Great American Health Debate The Heart of [...]
Posted in 1 philosophy | Also tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Heart of Philosophy

The comment thread on Mark Vernon’s fourth instalment of his Plato series has taken a most interesting turn. (My earlier post True Love discussed this article, arguing that it reflects a modern propensity to take a wilfully irrational approach to love and other related concepts.) Mark has responded to criticism in the comment thread to argue [...]
Posted in 1 philosophy, topical | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why religion is valuable

In my previous post, The problem with the Enlightenment, I set out my conviction that the Enlightenment had established a false view of the self, that I labelled Romantic, and that this false view had insinuated itself into modern religion as well as its discontents. (See The romantic Austen (IV) for a taster of [...]
Posted in 1 philosophy, commentary | Also tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Republic and the Social Contract

John Holbo has replied to my comment on his blog and my earlier post, where I expressed my admiration for his book while taking issue with the (entirely standard contemporary view) that the book is concerned with politics in the abstract, citing Robin Waterfield’s introduction to the OWC Republic. As John says, ‘who is to say?’ [...]
Posted in 1 philosophy | Also tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why this Matters

Who cares whether Butler, Kant or Hume correctly (or not) divined the number of angels on the heads of our pins?  It is all philosophy (I am imagining Feynman’s drawl here).  Who cares? It matters because if we carry around incoherent ideas about our conduct then we will end up in a horrible pickle in big [...]
Posted in 1 philosophy | Also tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Back to Butler

It is well known that Hume had Joseph Butler in mind in preparing his Thesis for publication. It is rather a shame (I would say in philosophical terms tragic) that he didn’t get a critique from Butler, prior to publication; it could have saved him considerable heartache (bearing in mind that he did ultimately [...]
Posted in 1 philosophy | Also tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Slave of the Passions

Hume is widely considered to be the most important philosopher ever to write in English and the Treatise of Human Nature (1739-40) to be his greatest work.  It concludes. Conclusion of this book Thus upon the whole I am hopeful, that nothing is wanting to an accurate proof of this system of ethics. David Hume, A Treatise of [...]
Posted in 1 philosophy | Also tagged , , , , | Leave a comment